Which is NOT a method used to try civilians on military installations?

Which is NOT a method used to try civilians on military installations?

• A. Court-Martial
• B. District Court
• C. Magistrate Court
• D. SAUSA

Answer: (A)

Civilian cases on a military installation fall under civilian jurisdiction, not the military justice system. Court-martial is a military tribunal used to try service members under the UCMJ, so it isn’t a path for trying civilians. In contrast, District Court and Magistrate Court are civilian venues that can handle criminal matters involving civilians, and a Special Assistant United States Attorney is a civilian prosecutor working in federal court. Because a court-martial operates under military law and for military personnel, it’s the method that doesn’t fit for civilians on base.

Civilian cases on a military installation fall under civilian jurisdiction, not the military justice system. Court-martial is a military tribunal used to try service members under the UCMJ, so it isn’t a path for trying civilians. In contrast, District Court and Magistrate Court are civilian venues that can handle criminal matters involving civilians, and a Special Assistant United States Attorney is a civilian prosecutor working in federal court. Because a court-martial operates under military law and for military personnel, it’s the method that doesn’t fit for civilians on base.